<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 211 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251185</link>
    <description>The appellate authority upheld the decision allowing depreciation on the windmill&#039;s foundation and commissioning costs at the higher rate applicable to the windmill. The decision distinguished the case from a previous one and emphasized the functional integration of the foundation with the windmill. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the pro-rata depreciation approach for the windmill components.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 211 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251185</link>
      <description>The appellate authority upheld the decision allowing depreciation on the windmill&#039;s foundation and commissioning costs at the higher rate applicable to the windmill. The decision distinguished the case from a previous one and emphasized the functional integration of the foundation with the windmill. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the pro-rata depreciation approach for the windmill components.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>