<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1003 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166252</link>
    <description>Under Rule 10, a Government servant detained in custody for more than 48 hours is deemed under suspension from the date of detention, so the 90-day review period runs from that effective date, not from the later formal suspension order. Continuation of suspension beyond that period without timely review is invalid. On limitation, the challenge was not shown to have been argued before the Tribunal, and repeated extensions of suspension were treated as giving rise to a continuing cause of action, so the original application was not time-barred. The writ petition therefore failed and the Tribunal&#039;s relief remained in force.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1003 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166252</link>
      <description>Under Rule 10, a Government servant detained in custody for more than 48 hours is deemed under suspension from the date of detention, so the 90-day review period runs from that effective date, not from the later formal suspension order. Continuation of suspension beyond that period without timely review is invalid. On limitation, the challenge was not shown to have been argued before the Tribunal, and repeated extensions of suspension were treated as giving rise to a continuing cause of action, so the original application was not time-barred. The writ petition therefore failed and the Tribunal&#039;s relief remained in force.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>