<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1003 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166252</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the suspension order exceeding 90 days without review was in violation of service rules. The effective date of suspension was deemed to be the day of detention, not the formal order date. The Court dismissed the petition, emphasizing the importance of timely reviews and the continuous cause of action due to the prolonged suspension beyond the prescribed period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1003 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166252</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the suspension order exceeding 90 days without review was in violation of service rules. The effective date of suspension was deemed to be the day of detention, not the formal order date. The Court dismissed the petition, emphasizing the importance of timely reviews and the continuous cause of action due to the prolonged suspension beyond the prescribed period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>