<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 208 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251182</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed based on factual findings that the payments were reimbursements not subject to TDS, and amounts paid to clearing and forwarding agents were below the threshold requiring TDS. The court affirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision, finding no merit in the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 09:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 208 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251182</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed based on factual findings that the payments were reimbursements not subject to TDS, and amounts paid to clearing and forwarding agents were below the threshold requiring TDS. The court affirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision, finding no merit in the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>