https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251171 The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 2,60,000 as unexplained expenditure for the renovation of a flat due to lack of supporting evidence. The addition of Rs. 1,00,000 as undisclosed income was upheld based on inconsistencies in explanations. The Tribunal directed the deletion of additions related to implant receipts as undisclosed income for various assessment years, noting lack of evidence and incorrect treatment by the AO. The deletion of an addition of Rs. 21,00,125 by the CIT(A) was upheld due to jurisdictional limits and sufficient evidence provided by the assessee. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Sep 2014 08:47:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251171 The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 2,60,000 as unexplained expenditure for the renovation of a flat due to lack of supporting evidence. The addition of Rs. 1,00,000 as undisclosed income was upheld based on inconsistencies in explanations. The Tribunal directed the deletion of additions related to implant receipts as undisclosed income for various assessment years, noting lack of evidence and incorrect treatment by the AO. The deletion of an addition of Rs. 21,00,125 by the CIT(A) was upheld due to jurisdictional limits and sufficient evidence provided by the assessee. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251171