<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 183 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251157</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the dismissal by the Tribunal for not obtaining approval from the Committee of Disputes. The Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was erroneous as it was made before a relevant judgment and did not align with the law established by the Supreme Court. The Court clarified that pending proceedings should not be dismissed for lack of permission following the Supreme Court&#039;s recall of the clearance requirement. The impugned order was set aside, directing the Tribunal to expedite the disposal of the appeal/stay application within two months from the date of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 183 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251157</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the dismissal by the Tribunal for not obtaining approval from the Committee of Disputes. The Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was erroneous as it was made before a relevant judgment and did not align with the law established by the Supreme Court. The Court clarified that pending proceedings should not be dismissed for lack of permission following the Supreme Court&#039;s recall of the clearance requirement. The impugned order was set aside, directing the Tribunal to expedite the disposal of the appeal/stay application within two months from the date of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>