<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 181 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251155</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the service tax demand, interest, and penalties. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding violation of natural justice, basis of service tax demand, relevance of subscriber base, and penalties were rejected. The tribunal emphasized the validity of subscriber base figures from written agreements with broadcasters and the binding nature of such agreements. Penalties were upheld under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, based on precedents. The decision was pronounced on 7/8/14.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 181 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251155</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the service tax demand, interest, and penalties. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding violation of natural justice, basis of service tax demand, relevance of subscriber base, and penalties were rejected. The tribunal emphasized the validity of subscriber base figures from written agreements with broadcasters and the binding nature of such agreements. Penalties were upheld under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, based on precedents. The decision was pronounced on 7/8/14.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>