<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251152</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, considering all aspects discussed, and disposed of the stay petition and appeal accordingly. The Tribunal found the deposits made sufficient under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, granting waiver of pre-deposit for balance dues and allowing the appeal by setting aside the impugned order for fresh adjudication based on the observations made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251152</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, considering all aspects discussed, and disposed of the stay petition and appeal accordingly. The Tribunal found the deposits made sufficient under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, granting waiver of pre-deposit for balance dues and allowing the appeal by setting aside the impugned order for fresh adjudication based on the observations made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>