<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 171 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251145</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the notice issued under Section 148 was time-barred as the pre-condition for invoking Section 149(1)(c) was not met. The impugned notice dated 13.06.2013, the order dated 19.12.2013, and all subsequent proceedings were set aside. The writ petition was allowed, and the court clarified that the decision was based on the recorded reasons and the context of the plea of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:32:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 171 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251145</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the notice issued under Section 148 was time-barred as the pre-condition for invoking Section 149(1)(c) was not met. The impugned notice dated 13.06.2013, the order dated 19.12.2013, and all subsequent proceedings were set aside. The writ petition was allowed, and the court clarified that the decision was based on the recorded reasons and the context of the plea of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>