<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 166 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251140</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, ruling against the appellant company. The court determined that the expenditure incurred for its subsidiary did not qualify for deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It emphasized the separate legal entities of the appellant and its subsidiary, stating that the expenditure lacked a direct nexus to the appellant&#039;s business activities. The court highlighted the requirement for a clear connection between the expenditure and the appellant&#039;s business for it to be allowable, ultimately dismissing the appeal in favor of the revenue authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 166 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251140</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, ruling against the appellant company. The court determined that the expenditure incurred for its subsidiary did not qualify for deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It emphasized the separate legal entities of the appellant and its subsidiary, stating that the expenditure lacked a direct nexus to the appellant&#039;s business activities. The court highlighted the requirement for a clear connection between the expenditure and the appellant&#039;s business for it to be allowable, ultimately dismissing the appeal in favor of the revenue authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>