<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 162 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251136</link>
    <description>Credit card expenses were disallowed where the assessee failed to produce bills, vouchers or other proof showing exclusive business use, and the claim was upheld as non-business expenditure. Section 40(a)(ia) relief was confined to payments where tax was deducted and deposited before the return-filing due date, while amounts with no deduction, including faculty and commission-like franchise incentive payments, remained disallowed subject to verification. Cash payments routed through an imprest account under section 40A(3) required factual verification and were remitted. Employees&#039; provident fund contribution paid before the return deadline was held allowable, subject to date-wise verification. Unrecorded commission to doctors was accepted as expenditure under section 69C, but the addition was reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:06:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 162 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251136</link>
      <description>Credit card expenses were disallowed where the assessee failed to produce bills, vouchers or other proof showing exclusive business use, and the claim was upheld as non-business expenditure. Section 40(a)(ia) relief was confined to payments where tax was deducted and deposited before the return-filing due date, while amounts with no deduction, including faculty and commission-like franchise incentive payments, remained disallowed subject to verification. Cash payments routed through an imprest account under section 40A(3) required factual verification and were remitted. Employees&#039; provident fund contribution paid before the return deadline was held allowable, subject to date-wise verification. Unrecorded commission to doctors was accepted as expenditure under section 69C, but the addition was reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>