<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (12) TMI 78 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166242</link>
    <description>An obvious computational mistake shown in the assessment record itself can constitute information for reopening under section 34, and the existence of rectification powers does not bar reassessment where the statutory conditions are otherwise satisfied. The reopening was therefore upheld. In life insurance valuation, the carry-forward loss had to be confined to the annual loss computed for the relevant year under the applicable special rule, not the full cumulative actuarial deficiency for the quinquennial period. The assessee was accordingly entitled only to the yearly loss amount, and the larger aggregate deficiency could not be carried forward. Both issues were decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:30:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (12) TMI 78 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166242</link>
      <description>An obvious computational mistake shown in the assessment record itself can constitute information for reopening under section 34, and the existence of rectification powers does not bar reassessment where the statutory conditions are otherwise satisfied. The reopening was therefore upheld. In life insurance valuation, the carry-forward loss had to be confined to the annual loss computed for the relevant year under the applicable special rule, not the full cumulative actuarial deficiency for the quinquennial period. The assessee was accordingly entitled only to the yearly loss amount, and the larger aggregate deficiency could not be carried forward. Both issues were decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>