https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166241 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not ordinarily exercised where an effective statutory appeal is available to the same court, even though it may still be invoked for breach of natural justice. As a statutory appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was available against the Tribunal's orders, the Karnataka HC declined to entertain the writ petition and rejected it, while granting liberty to pursue the statutory appeal. en-us Mon, 30 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:45:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166241 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not ordinarily exercised where an effective statutory appeal is available to the same court, even though it may still be invoked for breach of natural justice. As a statutory appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was available against the Tribunal's orders, the Karnataka HC declined to entertain the writ petition and rejected it, while granting liberty to pursue the statutory appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166241