<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 109 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251083</link>
    <description>Entertainment tax under the unamended U.P. Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 was held to extend to DTH services because the levy targeted entertainment itself, not the delivery technology, and the inclusive definitions of &quot;entertainment&quot; and &quot;payment for admission&quot; were read broadly. The 2009 amendment expressly including DTH services was upheld as within the State&#039;s legislative competence and treated as clarificatory of an existing taxable subject, with entertainment tax and service tax operating in separate fields. The challenge to the levy and consequential notices on discriminatory or other constitutional grounds failed, and the impugned levy and notices were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 109 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251083</link>
      <description>Entertainment tax under the unamended U.P. Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 was held to extend to DTH services because the levy targeted entertainment itself, not the delivery technology, and the inclusive definitions of &quot;entertainment&quot; and &quot;payment for admission&quot; were read broadly. The 2009 amendment expressly including DTH services was upheld as within the State&#039;s legislative competence and treated as clarificatory of an existing taxable subject, with entertainment tax and service tax operating in separate fields. The challenge to the levy and consequential notices on discriminatory or other constitutional grounds failed, and the impugned levy and notices were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>