<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 97 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251071</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision not to classify short term capital gains on the sale of shares as income from business. The judgment highlighted the significance of maintaining separate portfolios for investments and trading activities, emphasizing the factual circumstances and turnover ratios as supporting factors for distinguishing income from short term capital gains from business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:18:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 97 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251071</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision not to classify short term capital gains on the sale of shares as income from business. The judgment highlighted the significance of maintaining separate portfolios for investments and trading activities, emphasizing the factual circumstances and turnover ratios as supporting factors for distinguishing income from short term capital gains from business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>