<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 95 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251069</link>
    <description>Capital gains earned by UAE resident account holders from sale of securities in India were treated as not taxable under the India-UAE tax treaty on the concurrent findings of the Tribunal and CIT(A), and the bank was therefore not required to deduct tax at source. The Court found no perversity in those factual and legal conclusions and held that no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 95 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251069</link>
      <description>Capital gains earned by UAE resident account holders from sale of securities in India were treated as not taxable under the India-UAE tax treaty on the concurrent findings of the Tribunal and CIT(A), and the bank was therefore not required to deduct tax at source. The Court found no perversity in those factual and legal conclusions and held that no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>