<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 86 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251060</link>
    <description>Recovery pursuant to the demand notices was stayed temporarily while the appeals remained pending, and the petitioners were allowed to seek stay before the appellate authority within three weeks. The court directed that the appeals be disposed of preferably within three months, ensuring that recovery proceedings remained in abeyance in the meantime. The operative effect was to preserve the petitioners&#039; appellate remedy while preventing coercive recovery until the stay application and appeals were considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:12:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 86 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251060</link>
      <description>Recovery pursuant to the demand notices was stayed temporarily while the appeals remained pending, and the petitioners were allowed to seek stay before the appellate authority within three weeks. The court directed that the appeals be disposed of preferably within three months, ensuring that recovery proceedings remained in abeyance in the meantime. The operative effect was to preserve the petitioners&#039; appellate remedy while preventing coercive recovery until the stay application and appeals were considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>