<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1001 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166236</link>
    <description>Where deliberate evasion and mens rea were sustained under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the Tribunal could not reduce the penalty on that basis alone. The Tribunal&#039;s reduction of penalty was disapproved because it was inconsistent with the finding of wilful evasion, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1001 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166236</link>
      <description>Where deliberate evasion and mens rea were sustained under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the Tribunal could not reduce the penalty on that basis alone. The Tribunal&#039;s reduction of penalty was disapproved because it was inconsistent with the finding of wilful evasion, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>