https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166235 The Supreme Court held that failure to expressly state that the dismissing authority accepted findings against the officer does not invalidate the notice under Article 311(2). The Court emphasized that the notice indicating provisional conclusions implies acceptance of the enquiring officer's findings. The Court overturned the High Court's decision, ruling that the order of demotion was valid, and dismissed the respondent's writ petition. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166235 The Supreme Court held that failure to expressly state that the dismissing authority accepted findings against the officer does not invalidate the notice under Article 311(2). The Court emphasized that the notice indicating provisional conclusions implies acceptance of the enquiring officer's findings. The Court overturned the High Court's decision, ruling that the order of demotion was valid, and dismissed the respondent's writ petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166235