<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 74 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251048</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the service tax demand on the basis of limitation and remanding the matter for quantification within the valid period. The tribunal also revoked the penalties imposed on the appellants, finding no justifiable reason for penalization. The decision dispensed with the pre-deposit condition and provided relief to the appellants in the dispute over liability for service tax payment for GTA services received.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 74 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251048</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the service tax demand on the basis of limitation and remanding the matter for quantification within the valid period. The tribunal also revoked the penalties imposed on the appellants, finding no justifiable reason for penalization. The decision dispensed with the pre-deposit condition and provided relief to the appellants in the dispute over liability for service tax payment for GTA services received.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>