https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251044 The Tribunal granted relief to the appellant by waiving the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found that the imposition of the penalty was not sustainable as there was no proposal or finding indicating that the goods were liable for confiscation. Therefore, the recovery of the penalty was stayed during the appeal process, providing the appellant with a favorable outcome against the penalty for suppression of production and clandestine removal. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:52:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251044 The Tribunal granted relief to the appellant by waiving the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found that the imposition of the penalty was not sustainable as there was no proposal or finding indicating that the goods were liable for confiscation. Therefore, the recovery of the penalty was stayed during the appeal process, providing the appellant with a favorable outcome against the penalty for suppression of production and clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251044