<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 66 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251040</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s challenge against the disallowance of CENVAT credit for samples taken for testing within the factory was successful. The judge directed the appellant to produce the original register for assessment and instructed reliance on a previous verification report. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal for a fresh decision, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing. The case was remanded for further review and consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:48:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 66 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251040</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s challenge against the disallowance of CENVAT credit for samples taken for testing within the factory was successful. The judge directed the appellant to produce the original register for assessment and instructed reliance on a previous verification report. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal for a fresh decision, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing. The case was remanded for further review and consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>