<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 53 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251027</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in appeals against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s orders. It held that the Assessing Officer had conducted necessary inquiries into the genuineness of agricultural income, contrary to the CIT&#039;s assertion. The Court found the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 unjustified, as the Assessing Officer had complied with directives. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the CIT&#039;s revisional order, disregarding the relevance of prior orders. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed as having academic value, resulting in the dismissal of both Department appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:35:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 53 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251027</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in appeals against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s orders. It held that the Assessing Officer had conducted necessary inquiries into the genuineness of agricultural income, contrary to the CIT&#039;s assertion. The Court found the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 unjustified, as the Assessing Officer had complied with directives. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the CIT&#039;s revisional order, disregarding the relevance of prior orders. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed as having academic value, resulting in the dismissal of both Department appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>