<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 46 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251020</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the validity of notices issued by the Assessing Officer under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening assessments for A.Y. 2006-07 and A.Y. 2007-08. The court found the reasons for reopening assessments to be valid, based on suspicions of bogus transactions by the assessee company with certain suppliers. It concluded that the notices contained necessary particulars supporting the belief that income had escaped assessment, and declined to interfere with the reassessment process, leaving all contentions open for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:07:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 46 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251020</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the validity of notices issued by the Assessing Officer under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening assessments for A.Y. 2006-07 and A.Y. 2007-08. The court found the reasons for reopening assessments to be valid, based on suspicions of bogus transactions by the assessee company with certain suppliers. It concluded that the notices contained necessary particulars supporting the belief that income had escaped assessment, and declined to interfere with the reassessment process, leaving all contentions open for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>