<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 421 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166230</link>
    <description>A claim to the special landlord category of &quot;widow&quot; under Section 23-J of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 requires proof of the husband&#039;s death; desertion or lack of reliable evidence of death is insufficient. The High Court also held that, because eviction had not been pleaded or tried on the footing of the petitioner being a divorced wife, and no evidence had been led on that basis, fairness justified remitting the matter for amendment of pleadings and fresh evidence. The dismissal order was set aside, and the question of bona fide requirement was left open for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 11:09:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 421 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166230</link>
      <description>A claim to the special landlord category of &quot;widow&quot; under Section 23-J of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 requires proof of the husband&#039;s death; desertion or lack of reliable evidence of death is insufficient. The High Court also held that, because eviction had not been pleaded or tried on the footing of the petitioner being a divorced wife, and no evidence had been led on that basis, fairness justified remitting the matter for amendment of pleadings and fresh evidence. The dismissal order was set aside, and the question of bona fide requirement was left open for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>