<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 36 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251010</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, directing the Tribunal to expedite the case&#039;s disposal, after finding the delay justifiable and criticizing the Tribunal&#039;s failure to adopt a pragmatic approach and appreciate the reasons for delay presented by the appellant department. The Court emphasized the need for leniency in condoning delays, especially when the Government is the appellant, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s observations in a relevant case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 36 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251010</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, directing the Tribunal to expedite the case&#039;s disposal, after finding the delay justifiable and criticizing the Tribunal&#039;s failure to adopt a pragmatic approach and appreciate the reasons for delay presented by the appellant department. The Court emphasized the need for leniency in condoning delays, especially when the Government is the appellant, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s observations in a relevant case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>