https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250999 A technical breach in a letter of permission was treated as a curable procedural irregularity, capable of rectification through an appropriate application before the Development Commissioner. On the facts noted, no suppression of material information was established, so the extended period of limitation was held inapplicable. Because the amount already deposited covered the duty attributable to the normal period, it was considered sufficient for hearing the appeal, and interim relief was granted by waiving the balance pre-deposit and staying recovery during the appeal. en-us Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250999 A technical breach in a letter of permission was treated as a curable procedural irregularity, capable of rectification through an appropriate application before the Development Commissioner. On the facts noted, no suppression of material information was established, so the extended period of limitation was held inapplicable. Because the amount already deposited covered the duty attributable to the normal period, it was considered sufficient for hearing the appeal, and interim relief was granted by waiving the balance pre-deposit and staying recovery during the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250999