https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250965 The appellant's appeal against the Order-in-Appeal resulted in the reduction of the redemption fine to 10% of the confiscated goods' value. The penalty imposed under Rule 26 and Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was also decreased, considering the excess stock of goods within the factory but lacking indications of clandestine removal readiness. The confiscation of goods due to non-accountal and excess stock was partially allowed, with penalties reduced based on the overall evaluation of the case and absence of clear intent for clandestine removal. en-us Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250965 The appellant's appeal against the Order-in-Appeal resulted in the reduction of the redemption fine to 10% of the confiscated goods' value. The penalty imposed under Rule 26 and Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was also decreased, considering the excess stock of goods within the factory but lacking indications of clandestine removal readiness. The confiscation of goods due to non-accountal and excess stock was partially allowed, with penalties reduced based on the overall evaluation of the case and absence of clear intent for clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250965