<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 908 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant an unconditional stay order, relieving them from depositing duty or penalty. Despite the Revenue&#039;s repeated adjournment requests, the Tribunal released the bank guarantee in favor of the appellant, as the stay was not contingent upon it. The decision was influenced by the case&#039;s merits and pending Supreme Court rulings. The matter was adjourned for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:09:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 908 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant an unconditional stay order, relieving them from depositing duty or penalty. Despite the Revenue&#039;s repeated adjournment requests, the Tribunal released the bank guarantee in favor of the appellant, as the stay was not contingent upon it. The decision was influenced by the case&#039;s merits and pending Supreme Court rulings. The matter was adjourned for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>