<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 906 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250956</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of interest levied under Section 217(1A) was incorrect. It determined that the Assessing Officer had the authority to impose interest under Section 217(1A) and that the Tribunal&#039;s observation did not prevent the Assessing Officer from doing so. The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, allowing their appeal against the respondent assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 906 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250956</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of interest levied under Section 217(1A) was incorrect. It determined that the Assessing Officer had the authority to impose interest under Section 217(1A) and that the Tribunal&#039;s observation did not prevent the Assessing Officer from doing so. The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, allowing their appeal against the respondent assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>