<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 894 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250944</link>
    <description>Form-C is the statutory declaration used to claim concessional inter-State tax treatment, but a writ of mandamus will not lie where the entity sought to be compelled is not legally bound to issue it under the Central Sales Tax framework. The note explains that, where the contract was with a managing director not registered under that Act and the contract also contained arbitration terms, the remedy for any resulting tax burden lay in contract enforcement rather than writ relief. It also states that, if Form-C is not produced, assessment at the higher rate of tax is not ordinarily disturbed in writ jurisdiction merely because the assessee expected the purchaser to furnish the form.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 894 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250944</link>
      <description>Form-C is the statutory declaration used to claim concessional inter-State tax treatment, but a writ of mandamus will not lie where the entity sought to be compelled is not legally bound to issue it under the Central Sales Tax framework. The note explains that, where the contract was with a managing director not registered under that Act and the contract also contained arbitration terms, the remedy for any resulting tax burden lay in contract enforcement rather than writ relief. It also states that, if Form-C is not produced, assessment at the higher rate of tax is not ordinarily disturbed in writ jurisdiction merely because the assessee expected the purchaser to furnish the form.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>