<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 894 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250944</link>
    <description>Form-C enables a registered dealer to claim concessional treatment for inter-State transactions. Where the contractual purchaser is not registered under the Central Sales Tax Act and has no statutory duty to issue Form-C, mandamus cannot compel issuance of the declaration; contractual disputes remain subject to agreed remedies, including arbitration. Non-production of Form-C permits assessment at the higher applicable tax rate even where the assessee&#039;s accounts and transactions are otherwise accepted. The resulting differential tax burden must be pursued against the contracting purchaser through contractual remedies rather than by challenging the assessment in writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 894 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250944</link>
      <description>Form-C enables a registered dealer to claim concessional treatment for inter-State transactions. Where the contractual purchaser is not registered under the Central Sales Tax Act and has no statutory duty to issue Form-C, mandamus cannot compel issuance of the declaration; contractual disputes remain subject to agreed remedies, including arbitration. Non-production of Form-C permits assessment at the higher applicable tax rate even where the assessee&#039;s accounts and transactions are otherwise accepted. The resulting differential tax burden must be pursued against the contracting purchaser through contractual remedies rather than by challenging the assessment in writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>