<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 880 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that interest under Section 18(3) of the Customs Act was not applicable to provisional assessments made before 13.07.2006, even if finalized after that date. The decision was based on the principle that statutory amendments creating new liabilities are generally prospective unless expressly or by necessary implication made retrospective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 880 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that interest under Section 18(3) of the Customs Act was not applicable to provisional assessments made before 13.07.2006, even if finalized after that date. The decision was based on the principle that statutory amendments creating new liabilities are generally prospective unless expressly or by necessary implication made retrospective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>