<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 872 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250922</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed all the appeals of the assessees, holding that penalties under sections 271D and 271E were not justified due to the genuine nature of transactions and the presence of a reasonable cause. The penalty orders were also deemed time-barred under section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 872 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250922</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed all the appeals of the assessees, holding that penalties under sections 271D and 271E were not justified due to the genuine nature of transactions and the presence of a reasonable cause. The penalty orders were also deemed time-barred under section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>