<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 261 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166202</link>
    <description>A coffee and milk based preparation requiring water and further mixing before consumption was treated as prepared food under Tariff Item 1B rather than the residuary Item 68. In construing the exemption dispute, the expression &quot;ready-to-serve beverage&quot; was given its ordinary common parlance meaning, so a product needing heating, dilution, or stirring before use does not qualify as ready to serve, even if intended for drinking. Technical dictionary meanings were considered unnecessary where the term is well understood in everyday usage. On that basis, the product fell outside the exclusion in Notification No. 17/70-C.E. and remained eligible for exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 261 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166202</link>
      <description>A coffee and milk based preparation requiring water and further mixing before consumption was treated as prepared food under Tariff Item 1B rather than the residuary Item 68. In construing the exemption dispute, the expression &quot;ready-to-serve beverage&quot; was given its ordinary common parlance meaning, so a product needing heating, dilution, or stirring before use does not qualify as ready to serve, even if intended for drinking. Technical dictionary meanings were considered unnecessary where the term is well understood in everyday usage. On that basis, the product fell outside the exclusion in Notification No. 17/70-C.E. and remained eligible for exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>