<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 289 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s order classifying Extra Hardened Technical Oil (HTO) under T.I. 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to precedents and the persuasive value of the Government of India&#039;s decisions, reinforcing the classification of HTO under the residuary item T.I. 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:17:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 289 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s order classifying Extra Hardened Technical Oil (HTO) under T.I. 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to precedents and the persuasive value of the Government of India&#039;s decisions, reinforcing the classification of HTO under the residuary item T.I. 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>