<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 859 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250909</link>
    <description>Classification of a composite road-marking product depended on the material giving it its essential character under the tariff interpretation rules, and the petroleum resin component did not qualify the product for the concessional notification; the product was therefore treated as outside that entry. The tinting machine, computer and UPS were treated as inseparable components of a single functional unit sold together, so they were assessed as one taxable unit at the applicable rate. Freight included in the price recovered from buyers formed part of taxable turnover, while sales returns were accepted because the supporting invoices, lorry receipts and return records established the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 859 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250909</link>
      <description>Classification of a composite road-marking product depended on the material giving it its essential character under the tariff interpretation rules, and the petroleum resin component did not qualify the product for the concessional notification; the product was therefore treated as outside that entry. The tinting machine, computer and UPS were treated as inseparable components of a single functional unit sold together, so they were assessed as one taxable unit at the applicable rate. Freight included in the price recovered from buyers formed part of taxable turnover, while sales returns were accepted because the supporting invoices, lorry receipts and return records established the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>