<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 858 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250908</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the demand for the period 01.10.05 to 31.05.07 time-barred due to a bonafide interpretation of the law regarding Cenvat credit utilization for providers offering both taxable and exempted services. The appellant&#039;s utilization of excess Cenvat credit for interconnectivity services was deemed permissible within the 20% limit as clarified in the Idea Cellular Ltd. case, resulting in the dismissal of the demand, interest, and penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 858 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250908</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the demand for the period 01.10.05 to 31.05.07 time-barred due to a bonafide interpretation of the law regarding Cenvat credit utilization for providers offering both taxable and exempted services. The appellant&#039;s utilization of excess Cenvat credit for interconnectivity services was deemed permissible within the 20% limit as clarified in the Idea Cellular Ltd. case, resulting in the dismissal of the demand, interest, and penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>