https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250903 The tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim as the appellants had availed drawback on exported goods and failed to demonstrate that the service tax claimed for refund was paid under services specified in Notification No.41/2007-ST. The CHA service, for which a significant portion of the service tax was paid, did not fall under the specified services for refund, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250903 The tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim as the appellants had availed drawback on exported goods and failed to demonstrate that the service tax claimed for refund was paid under services specified in Notification No.41/2007-ST. The CHA service, for which a significant portion of the service tax was paid, did not fall under the specified services for refund, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250903