<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 852 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250902</link>
    <description>Delay in depositing a pre-deposit amount may be condoned where the amount was ultimately deposited and the surrounding circumstances satisfactorily explain the lapse. The appeal had been dismissed only for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition, but the court accepted the explanation based on the earlier proceedings between the parties. On that basis, the delay was condoned, the dismissal order was set aside, and the matter was restored for hearing on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 852 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250902</link>
      <description>Delay in depositing a pre-deposit amount may be condoned where the amount was ultimately deposited and the surrounding circumstances satisfactorily explain the lapse. The appeal had been dismissed only for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition, but the court accepted the explanation based on the earlier proceedings between the parties. On that basis, the delay was condoned, the dismissal order was set aside, and the matter was restored for hearing on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>