<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 849 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250899</link>
    <description>The case involved the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs used in mines outside the factory premises. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the respondents, engaged in cement manufacturing, citing relevant legal precedents. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed by remand to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in line with specific case law, indicating the need for further examination based on legal precedents and circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 09:12:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 849 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250899</link>
      <description>The case involved the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs used in mines outside the factory premises. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the respondents, engaged in cement manufacturing, citing relevant legal precedents. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed by remand to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in line with specific case law, indicating the need for further examination based on legal precedents and circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>