https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250896 An administrative penalty and debarment for rapeseed imports could not be sustained where the impugned order conflicted with an operative CEGAT view interpreting the Import-Export Policy 1985-88, particularly para 197(2) read with paras 70(2), 75(1), 76 and the relevant appendices. The tribunal's earlier decision, not yet set aside when the writ petition was filed, required the authorities to defer contrary adverse action. However, because the underlying tribunal ruling remained under challenge in reference proceedings, the authorities were left free to proceed afresh after those proceedings concluded, subject to hearing the petitioner before any final adverse action. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 15:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250896 An administrative penalty and debarment for rapeseed imports could not be sustained where the impugned order conflicted with an operative CEGAT view interpreting the Import-Export Policy 1985-88, particularly para 197(2) read with paras 70(2), 75(1), 76 and the relevant appendices. The tribunal's earlier decision, not yet set aside when the writ petition was filed, required the authorities to defer contrary adverse action. However, because the underlying tribunal ruling remained under challenge in reference proceedings, the authorities were left free to proceed afresh after those proceedings concluded, subject to hearing the petitioner before any final adverse action. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250896