<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 845 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250895</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the order directing a pre-deposit for a statutory appeal. Emphasizing that hardship extends beyond financial aspects, the court highlighted the need for consistency in the application of law and facts by authorities. The court set aside the impugned order, directing the respondents to entertain the appeal without conditions and issue appropriate orders within eight weeks, without imposing any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 845 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250895</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the order directing a pre-deposit for a statutory appeal. Emphasizing that hardship extends beyond financial aspects, the court highlighted the need for consistency in the application of law and facts by authorities. The court set aside the impugned order, directing the respondents to entertain the appeal without conditions and issue appropriate orders within eight weeks, without imposing any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>