<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 201 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166167</link>
    <description>Confessional statements attributed to the accused were held inadmissible because they were made in the immediate presence of police, with police presence procured to overawe the accused, and were therefore barred from evidentiary use. The Court also found the documentary exhibits and surrounding circumstances unreliable, as the principal records were not prepared as regular panchanamas, remained unauthenticated for a substantial time, and failed to contemporaneously record essential facts. On the reliable material, the prosecution did not affirmatively prove receipt of money and goods as illegal gratification, so the convictions could not stand. The appeals succeeded, the convictions and sentences were set aside, and the accused were acquitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 201 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166167</link>
      <description>Confessional statements attributed to the accused were held inadmissible because they were made in the immediate presence of police, with police presence procured to overawe the accused, and were therefore barred from evidentiary use. The Court also found the documentary exhibits and surrounding circumstances unreliable, as the principal records were not prepared as regular panchanamas, remained unauthenticated for a substantial time, and failed to contemporaneously record essential facts. On the reliable material, the prosecution did not affirmatively prove receipt of money and goods as illegal gratification, so the convictions could not stand. The appeals succeeded, the convictions and sentences were set aside, and the accused were acquitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>