https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250875 The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit 25% of the service tax amount within eight weeks, failing which the appeal would be dismissed. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the claim of overlapping demands, the Revenue's efforts to ascertain liabilities, and the absence of demonstrated financial hardship by the applicant. The order aimed to balance the interests of the Revenue while providing a reasonable opportunity for the applicant to comply with the deposit requirement to stay the recovery of the remaining dues during the appeal's pendency. en-us Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250875 The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit 25% of the service tax amount within eight weeks, failing which the appeal would be dismissed. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the claim of overlapping demands, the Revenue's efforts to ascertain liabilities, and the absence of demonstrated financial hardship by the applicant. The order aimed to balance the interests of the Revenue while providing a reasonable opportunity for the applicant to comply with the deposit requirement to stay the recovery of the remaining dues during the appeal's pendency. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250875