<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (6) TMI 176 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166152</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of Cord Repair Fabric under Item 16A(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act but reclassified Criss-Cross Patches and Pre-shaped Cord Fabrics under Item No. 68 CET. The excise authority was directed to grant relief to the appellants within two months. The decision emphasizes interpreting the Act&#039;s nomenclature for accurate classification of goods, considering their composition and manufacturing process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:49:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (6) TMI 176 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166152</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of Cord Repair Fabric under Item 16A(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act but reclassified Criss-Cross Patches and Pre-shaped Cord Fabrics under Item No. 68 CET. The excise authority was directed to grant relief to the appellants within two months. The decision emphasizes interpreting the Act&#039;s nomenclature for accurate classification of goods, considering their composition and manufacturing process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>