<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 809 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the re-adjudication order unsustainable as it exceeded the scope of the Show Cause Notice and failed to adhere to the principles of natural justice. The order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the foundation of adjudication on the allegations in the notice and not deviating beyond its scope.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 809 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the re-adjudication order unsustainable as it exceeded the scope of the Show Cause Notice and failed to adhere to the principles of natural justice. The order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the foundation of adjudication on the allegations in the notice and not deviating beyond its scope.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>