<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 806 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250856</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the withdrawal of the depreciation claim during survey proceedings did not warrant a penalty, citing legal precedents and the specific tax computation under section 115JB. The decision was based on the genuine explanation provided by the assessee and the absence of tax evasion, ultimately allowing the appeal and setting aside the penalty on 13.08.2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:32:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 806 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250856</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the withdrawal of the depreciation claim during survey proceedings did not warrant a penalty, citing legal precedents and the specific tax computation under section 115JB. The decision was based on the genuine explanation provided by the assessee and the absence of tax evasion, ultimately allowing the appeal and setting aside the penalty on 13.08.2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>