https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166133 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of Electrical Insulating Tapes for countervailing duty assessment. The Tribunal determined that the goods should be classified under a different Tariff Item (Item 68) instead of Item 22F, as argued by the appellant. Relying on Notification No. 173/77 and a Tariff advice, the Tribunal found that the intention was to classify the goods under Item 68. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing a refund of the differential duty paid by the appellant within sixty days of the order. en-us Mon, 04 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:55:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166133 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of Electrical Insulating Tapes for countervailing duty assessment. The Tribunal determined that the goods should be classified under a different Tariff Item (Item 68) instead of Item 22F, as argued by the appellant. Relying on Notification No. 173/77 and a Tariff advice, the Tribunal found that the intention was to classify the goods under Item 68. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing a refund of the differential duty paid by the appellant within sixty days of the order. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166133