<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 781 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250831</link>
    <description>In a conditional stay of recovery proceedings arising from tax and penalty assessment orders, the High Court treated a personal bond as an adequate substitute for a bank guarantee where insistence on bank security was said to cause financial hardship. The security condition for continuance of stay was modified accordingly, and the appellate authority was directed to decide the statutory appeals on merits after receipt of the personal bond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 781 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250831</link>
      <description>In a conditional stay of recovery proceedings arising from tax and penalty assessment orders, the High Court treated a personal bond as an adequate substitute for a bank guarantee where insistence on bank security was said to cause financial hardship. The security condition for continuance of stay was modified accordingly, and the appellate authority was directed to decide the statutory appeals on merits after receipt of the personal bond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>