<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 759 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250809</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the deletion of penalties by the Ld. CIT(A) under section 271AAA of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that penalizing the assessee for undisclosed income, despite accepting the explanations provided, was unjustified. Emphasizing the lack of adverse material to rebut the claims, the Tribunal affirmed that the penalties were deleted rightfully, as the AO erred in initiating penalty proceedings without substantial evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 759 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250809</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the deletion of penalties by the Ld. CIT(A) under section 271AAA of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that penalizing the assessee for undisclosed income, despite accepting the explanations provided, was unjustified. Emphasizing the lack of adverse material to rebut the claims, the Tribunal affirmed that the penalties were deleted rightfully, as the AO erred in initiating penalty proceedings without substantial evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>