<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 233 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166123</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of countervailing customs duty on castings for motor vehicles, determining that the processes conducted abroad did not change the nature of the goods, which were considered to be iron castings falling under Item 25 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal found that the significant processing to transform the castings into motor vehicle parts occurred after importation into India, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:26:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 233 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166123</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of countervailing customs duty on castings for motor vehicles, determining that the processes conducted abroad did not change the nature of the goods, which were considered to be iron castings falling under Item 25 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal found that the significant processing to transform the castings into motor vehicle parts occurred after importation into India, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>